Asylum seekers at the US–Mexico border
Border cities such as Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez and Brownsville became waiting rooms for asylum seekers told to stay outside the United States while they tried to secure an appointment or hearing. Metering policies shut many people out, leaving families in shelters and informal camps exposed to violence and exploitation.
Local shelters and legal workers were already doing the hard work of tracking missing people and helping families navigate complex forms, but they were operating with almost no resources while the rules changed every day.

Our response
We built and coordinated a binational partnership linking legal clinics and community organizers in Tijuana, El Paso and the Rio Grande Valley. The work strengthened legal defense clinics that helped asylum seekers build cases, alongside organizing efforts inside shelters where people could share information and plan together. Our programs also included safety planning and emergency stipends for those at highest risk, such as women traveling alone with children, while teams documented turn backs and unsafe returns for use in future advocacy.
What changed
More people arrived at appointments with prepared testimony and evidence, and more understood the risks of signing documents they could not read. The documentation produced by shelter and legal workers now forms part of strategic cases challenging metering and wrongful expulsions and has informed reports to international human rights bodies about the right to seek asylum at the US–Mexico border.
Campus activism and free expression crackdowns in the US
Beginning in 2023, students and staff at universities across the United States organized sustained protest encampments about war and university investments. In response, administrations introduced restrictive protest rules and opened disciplinary cases against organizers, sometimes calling in police to break up demonstrations.
On many campuses, students and faculty started informal support groups and began searching for pro bono lawyers. These efforts were often scattered, leaving those most at risk, such as international students and students of color to face proceedings without independent advice.

Our response
We supported and staffed a network of campus-based and community legal projects on Northern and Southern California college campuses. Our team helped set up legal defense support for people facing sanctions and ran "know your rights" sessions to prepare organizers for meetings with administrators and police. We also supported safety planning for those facing doxxing, while partners documented cases across different universities to spot patterns and coordinate responses.
What changed
People facing investigations had access to counsel rather than navigating the process alone, and organized pushback forced some universities to revise or slow down new restrictions. The network also connected campus movements with off campus groups working on refugee justice and other rights struggles, reinforcing the understanding that attacks on protest in one space threaten everyone.
Indigenous land and water defense at pipeline sites
Indigenous nations in the United States continue to challenge pipelines that threaten rivers, sacred sites and treaty rights, including ongoing battles related to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Authorities have responded with aggressive surveillance and mass arrests, often using new critical infrastructure laws to turn peaceful protest near pipelines into a felony.
Those who were organizing camps and legal defense committees were juggling court dates and family care. Many community leaders tried to maintain local governance and direct actions simultaneously, often with very little outside funding.

Our response
We worked alongside Indigenous-led organizations and allied legal teams working along key pipeline routes. Grants focused on legal defense for those facing charges. Support also covered safety planning for leaders under threat and backed Indigenous led media projects that told the real story.
What changed
Land and water defenders were able to fight charges with proper legal counsel, helping avoid some of the harshest penalties while mounting broader challenges to repressive laws. Indigenous organizers reached wider audiences with their own framing of treaty rights and climate justice, shaping how courts and the public understood the conflict and reinforcing the link between sovereignty and the right to protest.




